P2Rx meeting

Dallas, Texas

May 21-23, 2001

EPA Region 6 offices

 

Attending:            Regions 1-2       - Andy Bray and Terri Goldberg

                        Regions 3-4       - John Calcagni and Sharon Johnson

                        Region  5          - Deb Jacobson, Gary Miller, Todd Schumacher, Bob Iverson

                        Region 6          - Ed Gonzalez, Fernando Parra

                        Region 7          - Rick Yoder, Kathy Cardwell

                        Region 8          - Mike Vogel, Laura Estes

                        Region 9          - Isao Kobashi

                        Region 10         - Crispin Stutzman

                        USEPA                        - Beth Anderson

 

Guests             Sam Coleman, EPA Region 6; John Cross, USEPA; Scott Butner, Greg Geyer

 

 

Day 1 - May 21

 

Sam Coleman, head of EPA Region 6, welcomed the group to Dallas and spoke about the other Pollution Prevention (P2) events taking place in Dallas this week.  He urged P2Rx to work closely with industry to inform people about the P2 efforts underway across the nation.  He said that industry feels it does not get the credit it deserves for the P2 efforts it makes.  Coleman also urged P2Rx to count energy and water conservation when calculating the benefits of P2.  He said energy and water will be increasingly important issues in the future.

 

 

Center reports

All of the Centers reported on their recent activities.  Written reports, newsletters, brochures, etc. that were handed out will be included with this written report.

 

Region 10 - Crispin said that PPRC has had some staff changes recently and told who is now working for the Center. (Note, Crispin's report was before the announcement that came later in the conference that Blair Henry has resigned as Executive Director of PPRC.  Blair's successor is Chris Wiley, a long time PPRC employee who can be reached at cwiley@pprc.org.)  The Northwest portion of the country is experiencing a drought and hydro is the chief electrical source in the area so there could be power problems soon.  PPRC hopes to have some reports on the issue up on its website next month.  She reported that PPRC also is developing a "measure" database for its projects.

 

Region 9 - Isao reported that energy is the major environmental issue now in his region.  Industries are rushing to find alternative power supplies, and some of these have fairly high pollution factors so pollution issues will get worse as the energy crisis grows.  Isao said that his region will have a conference in the California Wine County on October 24-26.  They are planning on 250 participants.  Isao reported that some of the largest firms in the Silicon Valley are working on the new "Sustainable Silicon Valley" initiative.  The firms are finding that developing an Energy Management System (EMS) goes a long way to better environmental management.  He said that Regions 9 and 10 are working together on the "e-waste" system.  His region also is working on hospital P2, and plans to develop information on the issue to put it up on the web.

 

Region 8 - Mike reported that there has been tremendous population growth in the "front range" of the Rocky Mountains.  Tellus has given a grant to Peaks to Prairies to study growth problems and community development in this area.  They will be trying to put P2 issues into the front of community development planning.  Mike also reported that Peaks to Prairies is working on a "clean, quiet snowmobile" project for Yellowstone National Park.  There are some three million visitors to Yellowstone each year, and efforts are underway to get information on P2 issues at the park in the hands of each visitor.  Mike adds that because of the drought in the area, there are major dangers of forest fires again this year.

 

Region 7 - Rick discussed his Topic Hubs and said they are going well.  His Center is trying to track where users are going on the web site so that news stories can be fine-tuned specifically for the user.  He also has placed "footers" on each page to remind users of upcoming meeting and other sessions.    Rick reminded everyone that they can be a "Google" search site for free if they are connected to a University.  P2RIC also is in the process of putting digital videos up on its website.

 

Region 6 - Eddie reported that his Center is moving beyond information to providing assistance.  Mexico has asked if the Southwest P2 Center could help develop assistance centers for Mexican industry.  Mexico is experiencing huge factory growth because of NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement).  Southwest P2Center also is developing a GIS site for the trucking industry so truckers can see where all the official waste sites are located.  The information will be in both Spanish and English. Eddie also he is making a special effort to go to all of the state's in his region to get them involved in P2Rx.  He is making progress in making state agencies more involved in P2 efforts.  He now has 3,000 schools in his "Watt Watcher's" program where students can identify waste in schools and inform school officials how they could be corrected.

 

Region 5 - Deb reported that the GLRPPR meeting will be in July in Madison, Wisconsin.  There has been a lot of interest in the meeting, and there should be good participation. She said that some design improvements are being developed for the GLRPPR website.  She said a project on Mercury reduction and health care P2 is underway and this will be a Topic Hub before long.  GLRPPR also is working on a P2 comic book project with AWMA.  The Topic Hub on printing is being populated, and quality review of the material is the next step.  Deb has gone to each state's website to find information on regulatory integration, printing and mercury for use in the Topic Hubs.   And, more than 200 contacts, including industry specialists have been placed into the contact database.

 

Regions 3-4 - John reported that for the P2 Infohouse, 28 industrial sectors have been done, and two more are in the works to be done by the end of the summer.  He said the P2 Infohouse has over 10,000 references.  He is creating expert mail groups in his states to keep them informed and to help keep this information up to date.  He also has developed peer review workgroups in his states to review quality help keep it current. John reports that his search engine is getting more "hits" and his "Ask Rudy" service is getting several call daily.  His vendor database now has 4,000 contacts.  His Region also will be hosting a DoD meeting in Atlanta on June 24-26.

 

Region 1 & 2 - Andy reported that Karen Thomas is the new school education coordinator in his office.   He said he would use information from a new manual that will be printed soon to populate the Metal Fabrication Topic Hub. Region 1 & 2 also is looking at an Innovate P2 "profile" and other ways to make their website more attractive.

Terri reported that New Jersey is now back as a member of NEWMOA after being separate from the group for awhile.  She said the NEWMOA annual report is now up on the website.  Terri said a thermometer exchange in her region has been a good opportunity to educate the public.  One exchange done in Vermont was utilized by 1/3 of the state's population.  NEWMOA has launched a new Mercury listserv.  The region is developing some P2 efforts for marinas and is working on P2 efforts in schools from Kindergarten through High School.  It also is developing an Environmental Management Accounting workshop with the EPA.

 

USEPA report

Beth Anderson reported that the PPIS money available to P2Rx has been cut about 2-3%.  The P2Rx Center grants have been read by all of the EPA Project Officers.  Beth feels this will provide better understanding among the project officers of what other centers are doing and how it all fits together into a national effort.  She said the reviewers liked the quality of the Centers' documents.  Comments will be coming from the Project Officers soon and some of the Centers will have to modify their grant proposals.  She said the Project Officers want to see how the various Centers are working together on the Topic Hubs and want to see further cooperation between Centers on making the Topic Hubs a valuable resource.  A condition will be added to the award notices that funding is contingent on delivery of Topic Hubs in the current grants by September 30, 2001.

 

Beth said that the two remaining proposals for the Program Manager position beginning in 2002 will be re-examined to see if they need to be changed because of items that are agreed upon during the session.  She will have a conference call with those people reviewing the proposals at 1 p.m. EST on June 12. The scoring mechanism that will be used in judging the proposals was distributed.  There was discussion on the percentages given for each portion of the mechanism.  A slightly modified form was agreed upon.

 

 

 

Mission and Strategic Planning

The planning session began with a discussion on the P2Rx Mission Statement.  There are several Mission Statements that appear on various websites, publications, etc.  The group discussed what it wanted in a Mission Statement, and the following statement was agreed upon:

 

"P2Rx is a national network of regional centers dedicated to improving the dissemination of pollution prevention information in the service provider community."

It was agreed that this Mission Statement should be placed on the P2Rx website and used in publications where it is appropriate.

 

Participants next discussed the goals of the organization.  Discussion centered on the ten general goals sent out by Jini Cook earlier.  Those present felt that those goals could be combined into four goals:

1.       Provide seamless access to high quality, synthesized, peer reviewed P2 information and expertise

2.       Minimize duplication of effort by developing information, organizing outreach efforts and producing publications

3.       Build a distribution channel for hard copy materials and access to electronic P2 information

4.       Promote networking of the service provider community

 

Based on those goals, the following objectives and tasks were developed.

 

Goal 1  Provide seamless access to high quality, synthesized, peer reviewed P2 information and expertise

Objective 1.1 –             By September 30, ’01 all initial topic hubs will be implemented and

on-line

Objective 1.2 –             By _____ implement a consistent format and set of standards for building topic hubs, programs database and other products

Objective 1.3 –             By ______ adopt and implement a minimum quality assurance protocol

                        Task 1.3.1. – Document current practices

Objective 1.4 –             Coordinate the collection and addition of information added to topic hubs, programs database and other products

                        Task 1.4.1 – Conduct a gap analysis

Objective 1.5 –             Expand the measurements used to include more outcome measures

 

 

Goal 2  Minimize duplication of effort by developing information, organizing outreach efforts and producing publications                  

Objective 2.1 –             Communicate among Centers to establish a process to select topic hubs and a rationalization scheme

                        Task 2.1.1 – Conduct annual assessment of accomplishments and plan for new

                        Task 2.1.2 – Develop an organization scheme of topics and subtopics

Objective 2.2 –             Develop an organization hierarchy for all of the information on the P2Rx web site and regional centers web sites

Objective 2.3 –             Identify and share products of mutual interest

Objective 2.4 –             Foster collaboration among regional Centers for implementing topic hubs and other products

 

 

Goal  3   Build a distribution channel for hard copy materials and access to electronic P2 information

Objective 3.1 - Foster content sharing among P2Rx Centers and with targeted client groups

Objective 3.2 –             Use the programs database to create topical communities of mutual interest through specialized listerves

Objective 3.3 –             Identify hardcopy repositories available to and used by our clients

Objective 3.4 –             Make all national products available on the P2Rx web site

Objective 3.5 –             Identify key distribution targets and channels – federal, state and local

 

 

Goal 4  Promote networking of the service provider community

Objective 4.1 –            Pursue regional opportunities to facilitate networking

Objective 4.2 –             For each topic hub identify strategic national partners and develop collaborative relationships

Objective 4.3 –            Identify local priorities and convene forums to determine how to meet their needs

 

 

Goal teams were assigned to further develop the objectives and tasks for each goal.

Goal 1 - Fernando, Todd & Kathy

Goal 2 - Sharon, Rick, Andy & Kathy

Goal 3 - Fernando, Crispin, Todd & Laura

Goal 4 - Andy, Isao, Mike & Ed

 

 

 

Day 2 - May 22

 

Functional Specifications

Isao lead the discussion about this topic.  There was general agreement on the document that was presented, with a few minor word changes and additions.  The document will be re-written by Bob and Isao and posted on the P2Rx web site.

 

 

Content Sharing

Gary Miller led the discussion on content sharing.  There was discussion on how much content should be shared and in what manner.  It was determined that the solicitation should include the language on content sharing that we agreed to in the Functional Specifications document.  It was agreed that any content sharing plan must make certain that everything is searchable by full text and field; e.g. author, title, abstract, keyword.  The web group will meet tonight and discuss the technical aspects of content sharing.

 

The content solicitation will be re-written and sent to the Centers for a vote via e-mail.  Rick agreed to take the lead in creation of a "style guideline" to be used in Content Sharing. He will work with Kathy, Laura and Andy on this assignment.

 

 

 

Web Committee report

The Web Committee met the previous night, and Andy reported on items discussed.  The group talked about the process for adding terms.  Kathy has drafted a decision tree that will be used in the process.  The group is modifying a list of vocabulary terms on specific subjects that are not covered by the current list of vocabulary words.  It was felt that when a Center is initially creating a Hub, it should review the Thesaurus, select key words and then if necessary Kathy and the others will add the new terms.  This should not be done after the Topic Hub documents have been catalogued.  The check should be performed at the beginning of the process.

 

Fernando and Andy will create an electronic version of the Thesaurus that will be placed on the P2Rx web site.  It also will be integrated into the various Centers' sites.

 

Other topics discussed included:

¨       Rate a Link - this is mainly ready to go.  Some minor details are being addressed

¨       Rate this Function - There are two pieces to this; a "rate this page" and a "rate this function." Which option to use has not yet been resolved.

¨       Integration of Hubs and Programs database - Fernando has worked to integrate these two. A mechanism has been created to show programs from other Center's sites when a user selects "Where to go for help." It also will show regional and national programs that have contacts on that topic.  It will sort these alphabetically. This program also includes a feature where if there is a bad link, the system will send an e-mail to the regional Center's web master and will send a message identifying the possible problem to the original author of the Hub.

¨       Todd has agreed to create a task checklist to accompany Hub guidance documents.  This will give step by step directions for implementation of a Hub.

 

 

 

What are priorities concerning the Hubs in the next six months?

Participants felt that the following items are a priority after the first set of Topic Hubs go on-line on September 30, 2001.

2        The matrix that appears on the P2Rx website needs to be updated

2        The web group needs to develop a Topic Hub management document. It would outline items such as the checklist, maintenance of a Hub, Hub populating guide, etc.

2        An assessment team should look at the first set of Hubs to review them, suggest ways they could be "cleaned-up", look at strategic opportunities to use the information on the Hubs, etc.  This group will be Isao, Mike and Gary Hunt

2        The Topic Hubs should be demonstrated at an upcoming NPPR meeting

2        A process should be developed for selecting new Topic Hubs.  Rick, John and Andy will work on this

2        P2Rx needs to continue its efforts to expand communication with the USEPA

2        A marketing strategy needs to be developed concerning the Topic Hubs

 

 

 

Future Meetings

The group discussed the need for a meeting in the Fall of 2001.  Members will be on the lookout for meetings where we could combine our resources.  Rick said it is important to meet early enough so that the Centers can develop a joint funding plan for the next year to present to USEPA as a group.  He suggested late October or early November.  Isao said he is having a meeting in California in October, which might be a good opportunity.  He will send additional information out concerning this session.

Other possible dates for future meetings were discussed, including during the SBAP meeting in Chicago July 1-3, 2001; the NPPR meeting in Portland, Oregon in April of 2002; and the multi-state working group meeting Rick will hold in Nebraska in September of 2002.

 

 

Prioritizing Strategic Action Items

The group was asked to come up with ideas for action items and products that it would like to see P2Rx work on in the future.  Ideas presented were:

ã       Develop P2 news by topic format to put on web sites, listservs, and other collections. 

ã       Target services providers like OECA, DoD.  Develop a product or service we can use to work our way into their infrastructure

ã       Build on/expand the National P2 Electronic Library.  How do we make it stronger, what do we feed to the collection?

ã       Listservs - examine their effectiveness, should some of them be consolidated

ã       Build a mechanism for systematic feedback through surveys, focus groups, etc.

ã       Look for innovative P2 technologies and link with the "Technology Diffusion" initiative currently underway

ã       Local government capacity building - develop "how to do it" plan, provide training for this, training could even be on-line

ã       Integrate P2 information technology into schools such as community colleges

ã       Develop a one-stop locator for shared documents

ã       Develop sharing of successful strategies from Centers for regional capacity building

ã       Develop search engines

ã       Create new web tools for site management delivery

ã       Make P2Rx web site more of a hub than an administrative/management tool for members only

ã       Do more marketing, one item is to do a systematic registration with Search Engines so that P2Rx comes up higher on searches

ã       Integrate energy savings and water conservation measurements into Topic Hubs and other information developed by Centers

 

Participants did multi-voting on the topics.  The topics of Search engines and Develop P2Rx web site each got six votes.  The topics of P2 News, target service providers, expand the national library, and link with innovative technology diffusion each got five votes.  The other topics received two or less votes. Volunteers were sought for each of the top vote getting issues.  The volunteers and topics are:

 

  1. Search Engine – Crispin & Rick
  2. Develop P2Rx web site – Deb and Kathy
  3. P2 News – Andy & Laura
  4. Target service provider groups – Mike & Ed
  5. Build & expand national P2 library – John & Kathy
  6. Link with Innovative Technology Diffusion efforts – Isao, Terri and Gary Miller

 

Each group is to characterize the product and how it addresses one of the P2Rx goals.  The groups also should recommend if P2Rx can do the project next year or in the future, and whether funding should be sought for the project.  Each group should prepare a one-page document on the topic and send it to Jini Cook by Friday, June 29.

 

Search engine

Participants had a general discussion on installing a search engine on the Topic Hubs.  Discussion centered upon:

è      Having a Yahoo or Google style index that goes across all web sites and ties together the various Center sites

è      Need to explore "Dog Pile" type search capabilities

è      Need to explore opportunities to incorporate with search engines on other service provider's sites.

è      Check on other URL's to include in the search function/scope need criteria

 

 

Governance Document

The changes made in the Governance Document during the last Administrative Call were reviewed.  There were further discussions concerning language in the document.  Several changes were approved to make the document simpler. It also was agreed that the language agreed to in the P2Rx Executive Committee document should be incorporated into the Governance Document.  Bob and Crispin will rewrite the document based on the changes approved at this meeting.  It will then be sent to the Centers for an e-mail vote.

 

 

P2Rx Executive Committee

Gary Miller passed out an updated version of this document based on input from Isao and Gary Hunt. In discussion, the group decided that the committee's duties could be simplified.  Duties 2,4 and 8 were eliminated.  It was decided that the P2Rx Centers would select the members of this committee, which will be rotated.  Bob will rewrite the document as agreed upon by the Centers and incorporate it into the Governance Document.

 

 

 

Administrative Process Overview

The document prepared by Jini was discussed.  It was felt that the language where it says "Administrative Group" should now be changed to "Executive Committee."  WMRC will re-write this document based on suggested changes and using wording from the Executive Committee and Governance documents.

 

 

 

P2Rx Survey/questionnaires for our customers - Mike Vogel led this discussion

The discussion was about how this needs to be an on-going process so P2Rx can establish a baseline result. 

n       There needs to be a mechanism to actively receive input from our customers

n       P2Rx needs to identify service providers that we want to query

n       Need to determine what they know about P2Rx

n       Use the feedback to act as a marketing and a measurement tool

 

Gary Hunt and Mike Vogel will draft a baseline-input form that all Centers can use.  The goal will be to address awareness and needs.  Beth warned that EPA has severe legal limitations on the amount of surveying we can do with P2Rx funds or under the P2Rx effort.

 

 

Partnership document

Andy presented the document for review by the group.  No action was taken on the document.

 

 

 

 

Day 3 - May 23

 

Andy reviewed what the web group discussed in its meeting last night.  He said the group decided that the content sharing solicitation should read that proposals must respond to the Functional Specifications passed by P2Rx.  That way, all respondents will be working from the same information.  The solicitation also should be put out without the $4,000 price tag placed on it.  The web group felt that it was important to see what someone might charge for the work instead of setting the price up front.  The group also felt that to get content sharing completely developed it might cost more than $4,000, and the extra will have to come from other sources available to P2Rx or the individual centers. Andy Bray, Todd Schumacher and Gary Miller will rewrite the content sharing solicitation document.

 

Andy reported that more work needs to be done on the Topic Hub management document.  He felt that this work can be done over the listserv.

 

 

 

Marketing of P2Rx - Mike Vogel leading discussion

The group felt that P2Rx needs to decide

·         What is the product we are selling?

·         Who is the audience we want to reach?

·         What is the message we want to convey to the audience?

·         What media will be used?

·         P2Rx needs to examine the customers and determine what the customers need from us in terms of publicity media and message

·         The "P2Rx Brand" needs to be marketed as the source for impartial, trusted pollution prevention information

 

 

Ideas discussed included:

K       A brochure that can have inter-changeable parts that can be used in different ways for a variety of audiences

K       A standardized Powerpoint presentation that is available on the web - anyone speaking about P2Rx can use it and we can be certain that the same message is being put out everywhere

K       Distribute notification of all P2Rx news items on all of our list servs

K       Put notification of all news items on the P2Rx website and make available for all center's individual web sites

K       Develop a P2Rx information sheet for inclusion in the EPA pocketbook

K       Develop a P2Rx newsletter (electronic and printed)

K       The P2Rx website needs to be continually examined to see that it is customer-friendly, interesting and attractive.  Also, methods to get P2Rx site higher on search engines will be explored.

K       Prepare canned messages about pollution prevention topics and get them to various news media.  That way when a story comes up about a pollution issue, reporters will have an "expert" source to use from P2Rx.

K       P2Rx should work at getting its message out to trade associations

 

The discussion also turned to the Topic Hubs.  There were thoughts that some type of "roll-out" announcement is needed for when the Topic Hubs come on-line.  There was discussion about an overall "Topic Hub" announcement in time for the October coming on-line.  But there was no agreement on the timing of such an announcement.  The group also felt that a Topic Hub template needs to be developed so that when a new topic hub comes on line it lists what is now available, what is featured in the new hub and what benefit it would have to customers.  The center that populates the Topic Hub will provide the information for the announcement.

 

A work group was put together to explore marketing issues.  The group will be Mike Vogel, Bob Iverson and Rick Yoder.

 

 

 

Program database - Laura Estes leading discussion

A task list for the program database as it relates to the Topic Hubs is being developed.  The Web Group will discuss it during its upcoming conference calls.   It is expected that a draft of a document listing deadlines for this project will be completed by the end of June.

 

 

 

Technology presentations

Scott Butner informed the group about what he is doing in terms of content sharing with the National Compliance Assistance Clearinghouse.  He said the Clearinghouse uses a "Yahoo style" directory and currently has 4,000 links.  He hopes to have 10,000 links by the end of 2001. He would like to get his site and the P2Rx site linked.  Scott also spoke about the controlled vocabulary that he uses.  He said it is not as extensive as the controlled vocabulary recently approved by P2Rx.

 

Greg Geyer said that others find P2Rx valuable as a distribution channel.  He cited the example of how CCAR is working with Toyota to provide information to its dealers as a way we can work more closely with clients.  He feels there are plenty of potential partners for P2Rx, but they need to be identified and the products needs to be packaged in a way the partner can use. 

 

Later, Greg and Scott continued a discussion on technical issues with Andy, Rick, Crispin (and Bob for portions of it).  They went into detail about developing the "News" function.  Greg currently is doing this for the GLRPPR site and he will develop how much it would cost for P2Rx and for each center.  Greg and Scott will design a system strawman to present to the web group in the future. Greg will give a walk through of the system at a future conference call for the web group.

 

 

 

 

 

John Cross presentation

 

John Cross of the USEPA spoke to the group about some of the developments in the organization.  He said the Bush Administration is putting an increasing emphasis on "innovation."  Although he said what constitute innovation is not clearing defined, there may be ways that P2Rx can find funding through this new emphasis.

 

John said there is a new initiative in Congress to provide $25 million to states for compliance assistance.  He said this could include Pollution Prevention efforts and provide programs and funding for P2Rx. 

John also mentioned the following in answer to questions from participants:

¨       The "match" required with EPA grants is much despised and there are efforts to eliminate it.  However, so far those efforts have not been successful.

¨       As with any new administration, there have been delays in getting administrators approved.  So far, only two of the top EPA administrators have been approved.  There are still dozens awaiting approval.

¨      P2 needs to be sold as an integrated approach that works with compliance assistance efforts and contributes to energy and water conservation.

 

 

 

A planned meeting with Ken Zarker of NPPR was postponed because the majority of P2Rx representatives had to catch airplanes to return home.  Ken will be invited to participate in an upcoming Administrative Conference Call to determine how P2Rx can partner with NPPR.

 


An idea bank was posted during the meeting.  Ideas that came up during the session were placed in "the bank" and participants were invited to add additional ideas as they though of them.  The following ideas were posted:

 

Idea/Issues Bank

 

1.  Maintenance of topic hubs

-          Create expert workgroups

-          Create topic peer review groups

-          Look for other ways to validate quality

-          Add P2 and water savings to appropriate topics

-          Add P2 and energy savings to appropriate topics

 

2.       Additional topics to address

-          trucking & P2

-          Auto salvage yards

-          Vendors

-          DoD

-          Electronics

-          Supply chain management

-          EPP

 

3.       Web site content and tools

-     Provide more digital video

-          Develop an integrated contacts/programs database

-          Content sharing between Centers and outside network

-          Innovative technology P2 profiles (NEWMOA)

-          Virtual P2 planner

-          Develop training service

 

4.   Key relationships to foster

-          SBDCs

-          DOD

-          Regulatory agencies including USEPA’s Offices

-          Mexico and Canada

 

4.       Others

-          Improve measurement to address outcomes

-          Obtain content from National Labs (DOE)

-          Consider adopting new listserve software

-          Spanish version of web information and publications