Table of Contents


Internal Contacts

P2Rx Home

Administrative Documents


QA/QC Topic Hub Checklist



(Requirements for “topic” hubs)
Proposed as standard, January 15, 2003
Proposed as standard March 26, 2003
Adopted April 25, 2003

Major Categories

  1. Welcome and Table of Contents
    a. Do you identify the intended audience for this hub?
    b. Is the table of contents complete,that is, consistent with the sections in the hub?
  2. Do you have a “Background and Overview” section? (Background explains the problem; overview is what the hub is about.)
    a. In this section, do you adequately and clearly address the environmental or health impacts of this topic?
    b. Does the hub provide a clear definition of your topic?
    c. Does your hub have national or regional significance? (Include information, if possible, as to where this issue is significant)
  3. Do you have sections specific to your topic in lieu of an “Operations” section? (Organize your material ina way that is logical to your topic, trying to keep number of sections to a minimum.)
  4. Do you have a “Reasons for Change” section? (Note: If the topic hub does not have a “reasons for change” section, the reasons for change should be clearly identified in the sections used in lieu of “Operations” section.)
    a. In this section, do you list the incentives as to why someone would want to use alternative materials or methods in their operations/processes?
    b. Did you consider regulations, monetary incentives, training incentives, health and safety concerns, etc.?
  5. Do you have a “P2 Opportunities” section? (Note: If the topic hub does not have a “P2 Opportunities” section, the opportunities for pollution prevention should be clearly identified in the sections used in lieu of “Operations” section.) a. In this section, do you provide true P2 alternatives for this topic? (Remember, we’re trying to move people up the waste management hierarchy.) b. Are you sure that the alternatives you provide do not cause other problems that did not previously exist? If other problems may result from the alternatives provided, do you adequately address and describe what they can be? (Do you look at the whole picture, not just material substitution?)
  6. Do you have a “Where to go for Help?” section?
    a. In this section, do you provide contact information on a regional and national basis?
    b. Does your contact information include name of person, name of organization, address, phone number, fax, and e-mail?
  7. Do you have a “links” section?
    a. Do your links specify format if it is not html (e.g., pdf)?
    b. Are your links properly catalogued?
    c. Does each link have a description of fewer than 100 words?
  8. Do you have an “acknowledgements” page?
    a. Are clerical, web, and technical or subject specialist reviewers listed?
    b. Are the dates the reviews were completed listed?
    c. Are content sharing organizations listed?
    d. Are dates listed for when the links (should be monthly) and the content (should be annually) were checked listed?


  9. Back to P2Rx Administrative Information

    ^ Top