Hub QA Review Questions
Editorial Review
Version 1.0
Proposed October 18, 2002
Revised November 8, 2002
Proposed as standard, January 15, 2003
Proposed as standard March 26, 2003
Adopted April 25, 2003
-
Are all narrative pages written in consistent voice and style within the entire hub?
- Are spelling and grammar correct throughout the entire hub?
- Are all tables formatted consistently within a subsection? Within the entire hub?
(Note: All tables within a subsection need to be numbered sequentially and headings in the same location within the hub. For example, all headings should be at top or bottom, middle or left side, etc. Color or size is not the issue but consistency is desired. We are looking for intrahub consistency. We want to avoid the “cut and paste” look.)
- Are all figures formatted consistently within a subsection? Within the entire hub?
(Note: Same note as for tables.)
- Are acronyms spelled out the first time they’re used in every subsection?
- Are all links or items referred to in the narrative in place as advertised? Does the table of contents accurately and thoroughly reflect the content of the hub?
(Note: If a hub says, “see case study below,” then there needs to be a case study at the bottom. If a link or diagram is specifically referred to in the narrative or table of contents, it needs to be present and named the same thing.)
- Are common synonyms, key words and associated terms explained/mentioned? If no, is there a reference to a dictionary?
- Do subsections contain links to fact sheets, checklists, service providers and other resources to help answer questions?
(Note: We will not check as to whether or not these items are here. However, if they are present, we will check that any references to them are consistent with the narrative and that the links work. Additionally, all links – list of links – will be checked by the web reviewer.)
Back to P2Rx Administrative Information
^ Top
|
